A Vendor Take Back Mortgage or more commonly referred as VTB, is usually one of the “creative” financing options in a buy-sell Real Estate transaction, where the seller provides the buyer an amount as financing in second position to the main lender to help facilitate the purchase of the property. The take back mortgage usually will have a lien on title on the property until it is discharged.
It is very important to note that in Canada (unlike the USA), main lenders request that buyer has own stake in the deal, so no 100% financing is allowed.
Usually, VTBs are part of the Purchase and Sell Agreement, and not all lenders will accept them. The lenders that will accept will do with some restrictions, and in all cases, will want to see the buyer come up with more % than the actual % of the VTB, for example: Say Mr. Seller wants to sell his condo in Down Town Toronto to Mr. Buyer for full price of $255,000. Mr. Buyer who has 650 beacon has arranged a mortgage with a B-Type Lender for 70% of the Purchase Price. Mr. Buyer has 20% down payment from own funds but it is short 10%, so the buyer asks Mr. Seller if he would provide a VTB for the remaining 10% ($25,500 with a term of 2Yrs at 8% per yr payable monthly). Mr. Seller accepts the deal and puts a second charge on the property for $25,500 and will start receiving $170 per month for 24 months, and at the end, Mr. Buyer will pay out the $25,500 by refinancing the property.
What are the benefits of VTB to the Seller?
The most significant is to facilitate the sell of the property for top dollar. The second major benefit is that seller will continue to receive income stream of $X/ month during the term of the VTB, and the interest is around market value for a 2nd mortgage (between 8% and 15%), and that there may be tax benefits to the seller (depending on the circumstances and structure, please consult with your accountant).
What are the benefits of VTB to the Buyer?
Buyer could have lower than average beacon score, be able to acquire and control property with low down payment (not zero down). After the term, the buyer can refinance and payout the seller. During the time of the VTB, buyer can re-establish his credit.
Although VTBs have great advantages for both parties, it should not be entered lightly without having a Mortgage Broker and a Real Estate Lawyer look at the drafted Purchase and Sale agreement that includes the VTB clauses. For example, financing terms, rates, amortization, exit clause, “due on sale” clause, etc..You need to plan ahead for all sorts of situations: if the vendor dies, and their estate (including your mortgage) needs to be 'liquidated'; etc.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Monday, September 17, 2012
Referral fees - Legal or Not?
Real Estate
agents, Mortgage Brokers, Lawyers and many other professionals are “must have”
members of any investor’s power team. And through we try to structure our deals
such that they earn commission, it is not always possible. Occasionally we want
to compensate them directly for the help, effort and/or referral. At the same
time they might be in the same position. For example a realtor who referred a
client to a mortgage broker or lawyer. But have you ever wondered about the legality
and ethics of referral fees?
Realtors, mortgage brokers and lawyers have to be licensed and by paying a referral fee to their “Bird-Dogs” they introduce unlicensed person to their Trade, which is against the rules. So agents with different license can’t pay each other for the help received. The form of the referral fee (e.g. a bottle of wine, a cash payment, etc.) would not matter.
A realtor, mortgage broker or lawyer is, however, capable of receiving a referral fee from a third party (like an investor who doesn’t need to be licensed) provided that fees are disclosed to the client and the client agrees (preferably in writing). Referral fees are only acceptable when being paid to a registrant, through their brokerage, who (after taking a healthy bite) would in turn pay the agent.
However, agents can pay a referral fee for something not related to a transaction. So an agent can pay for a service to provide leads so long as the fees are for the leads not the transactions. This means no percentages and it has be paid whether or not the leads buy, sell or lease a property, gets a mortgage or closes with the given lawyer. Referred client must have given permission to have their information shared or else the Privacy Act steps in.
Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. For legal details consult your lawyer and read following documents:
Realtors, mortgage brokers and lawyers have to be licensed and by paying a referral fee to their “Bird-Dogs” they introduce unlicensed person to their Trade, which is against the rules. So agents with different license can’t pay each other for the help received. The form of the referral fee (e.g. a bottle of wine, a cash payment, etc.) would not matter.
A realtor, mortgage broker or lawyer is, however, capable of receiving a referral fee from a third party (like an investor who doesn’t need to be licensed) provided that fees are disclosed to the client and the client agrees (preferably in writing). Referral fees are only acceptable when being paid to a registrant, through their brokerage, who (after taking a healthy bite) would in turn pay the agent.
However, agents can pay a referral fee for something not related to a transaction. So an agent can pay for a service to provide leads so long as the fees are for the leads not the transactions. This means no percentages and it has be paid whether or not the leads buy, sell or lease a property, gets a mortgage or closes with the given lawyer. Referred client must have given permission to have their information shared or else the Privacy Act steps in.
Please note that the information provided herein is not legal advice and is provided for informational and educational purposes only. For legal details consult your lawyer and read following documents:
- ss. 30(b) and (c) of the Real Estate Business and Brokers Act, 2002
- Rule 2.08(8) of the Law Society of Upper Canada’s Rules of Professional Conduct
- Law Society of Upper Canada’s Practice Management Guidelines
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Toronto Market Watch: August 2012
Greater Toronto Area REALTORS® reported 6,418 sales in August 2012, representing a year-over-decline of almost 12.5 % compared August 2011. One might say that decline is do to stricter mortgage lending guidelines, which came into effect in July but the number of new listings reported in August was down also by 5.5% compared to the same period in 2011.
In the City of Toronto, the additional impact of relatively higher home prices coupled with the upfront cost associated with the City’s Land Transfer Tax led to a stronger annual decline in sales compared to the rest of the GTA.
The average selling price for August 2012 transactions was $479,095 – up by almost 6.5% compared to August 2011. The annual rate of price growth was driven by the low-rise home segment in the City of Toronto, including single-detached homes with an average annual price increase of 15%. Condo prices in 416 area continue to decrease (down 4% to $349 489)
“While sales were down year-over-year in the GTA, so too were new listings. As a result, market conditions remained quite tight with substantial competition between buyers in the low-rise market segment,” said Jason Mercer, TREB’s Senior Manager of Market Analysis. “The trends for sales and new listings are moving somewhat in synch, suggesting that the relationship between sales and listings will continue to promote price growth moving forward.”
Friday, September 7, 2012
The clock may be ticking on bank-offered cashback
Many banks have been slowly winding down their cashback offerings, although the first of the official deadline starts October 31.
This week, Scotiabank was the latest to announce it will drop its Free Down Payment program
on September 15.
Credit unions have not yet received any directive on the matter from DICO, but the general consensus is that the provincial regulating body will follow its federal counterpart eventually.
Thursday, September 6, 2012
No changes to prime rate!
The Bank of Canada has left interest rates at 1% due to the continuing worldwide slowing of economies.
According to the Bank, “the economic expansion in the United States continues at a gradual pace, Europe is in recession and its crisis, while contained, remains acute.” The Bank of Canada also stated “In China and other major emerging economies, growth is decelerating somewhat more quickly than expected from previously-rapid rates.”
No change is expected in the near future.
According to the Bank, “the economic expansion in the United States continues at a gradual pace, Europe is in recession and its crisis, while contained, remains acute.” The Bank of Canada also stated “In China and other major emerging economies, growth is decelerating somewhat more quickly than expected from previously-rapid rates.”
No change is expected in the near future.
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Your Financial Options
Not too many people know
that there are different options to finance your property.
Generally lenders
categorized by “A”, “B” and private money categories. They are different in terms
of: the geographical focus, the property types, the number of rental properties
one can own, some lenders have good products for self-employed individuals or
clients with challenged credit. They also differ in terms of supporting of
documentation required from the client to close the deal.
“A” lender include banks
and bank-like lenders. These are lenders with the most strict mortgage
qualification criteria to clients. Usually to qualify you need to have
income and good credit history. These financial institutions require full
documentation. Most of the time it is owner occupied property in locations with
strong economic fundamentals. On the other hand, they
offer the lowest rates to client and possibility of a small down payment.
“B” lenders deal with
lending situations that A lenders typically wouldn't accept. For example,
people with bad credit history: bankruptcy, consumer proposal, or low credit
score most likely will be accepted. They maybe clients who are self employed
and do not show the income to qualify with A lenders. People who invest in real
estate find this lending very useful because B lenders are more flexible with
locations and number of rental properties. In many cases, it is a short-term
solution until the client either gets their credit back in line or has the
income to qualify through A lender. 1 to 3 year fixed terms are common with
this type of lending.
Often the last
resort for those who cannot receive mortgages from other sources is private
money lend on equity in the property. The lender is not concerned with credit
or income but will review it to get an overall feel for the applicant. Also
larger down payment is required.
Construction financing for
small and large projects is popular in private lending because the lenders do
not impose the stringent guidelines that A lenders do on the client. The terms
are usually short and do not exceed 1 year period. Interest rates and fees are
higher than B lending.
New Member of Our Team - Mortgage Broker
Please welcome the newest member of 5 Corners team - Natalya Bobylyova.
Natalya is a mortgage agent and will offer you advice on Real Estate financing options as well as tips and tricks to make your investment more profitable.
You will find her articles under "Financing your Real Estate" and "mortgage trends" labels.
Natalya is a mortgage agent and will offer you advice on Real Estate financing options as well as tips and tricks to make your investment more profitable.
You will find her articles under "Financing your Real Estate" and "mortgage trends" labels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)